Was there a reason you opted not to include RB spelling? I don't know how may people use it- I find it really handy, so my vote would be for inclusion. ...Stan
Good question. I really appreacite the feedback. Thanks. No, actually the only reason is because I didn realize it :) because, I don't explicity load RB, it is loaded because as a dependency of OB-refactory, but it only needs the Refactoring-Core, not spelling, and that's why it wasen't loaded. However, it is really easy to change if we want. I just put the complete RB as requiered in in Pharo and that's all. In summary, no problem, if we want, I add it. I don't think even it is much problem to load it. And in the previous images it is was loaded, so, I like to idea to load it. What other things? cheers mariano
-- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/BetaTesting-ANN-Pharo1-0-10505-rc1dev10-01-1-tp4278312p... Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project