I like the idea to be able to use more traditional/well-known SCM, however we may be opening another can of worms here: CVS versus SVN versus GIT. In the end, if I would choose the above route, I would go with a tool I am familiar with, in my case SVN. I think the same would hold for other people, so in the end we may end up needing to support multiple tools. That's obviously not such a good idea ... On 29 Oct 2010, at 10:21, Geert Claes wrote:
A feedback post on the ESUG list from the GSoC somehow turned into an idea sandpit. I would like to test the water about one of the ideas to get a feeling about what people thoughts are regarding Pharo/GIT? Some groundwork has already been done via the gitocello (I like the name) project.
-- Johan Fabry jfabry@dcc.uchile.cl - http://dcc.uchile.cl/~jfabry PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile