On 19/5/14 14:31, Tudor Girba wrote:
Me too. I already gave a first set of feedback.
As a general matter, I would be interested in: - unifying with the ZnLogEvent
first we should integrate it and make sure that all the Transcript show are funnelled to the Log frameworks.
- Split the Log class
we will not split it because we iterated over the design since 8 months with norbert :)
- Possibly support Fuel serialization for each log entry Please go ahead.
Doru
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:01 AM, phil@highoctane.be <mailto:phil@highoctane.be> <phil@highoctane.be <mailto:phil@highoctane.be>> wrote:
SystemLogger interests me as well.
Phil
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name <mailto:norbert@hartl.name>> wrote:
Hi Stef,
Iâm definitely in for the SystemLogger. But as I am involved in it anyway a fresh look from another person on that stuff could be benefitial.
Norbert
Am 19.05.2014 um 09:10 schrieb stepharo <stepharo@free.fr <mailto:stepharo@free.fr>>:
> Hi guys > > This is a call for some of you that committed code and would like to do it with me :). > I have some projects that I would like to push further in 4.0 and I'm thinking that > he could be much more fun to do it with other people. > > Here are some topics > - integrating the systemLogger > - integrating/improving the new method categorizer > - cleaning fonts > - ... > > How this could work? > We could have > - some discussions > - make a little roadmap > - then we could work on the same slice and do code review > > I think that it can be fun and motivating. So let me know because I would like to have more social > coding. > > Stef >
-- www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com>
"Every thing has its own flow"