Yes sync with igor Stef On May 13, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Me too. I would rollback until we have a better solution and very well tested. I think right now the consequences and worst than the original problem.
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 12:24 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
1) have a fast/normal recompileAll 2) not to loose source code
If the only way right now is rollbacking #dropSourcePointer and rollbacking the implementation in objects as methods, please do it. Right now we are in the worst case. For example, today when I discover the bug of loosing sources...I commit my own package with a lots of methods with the decompiled source...it took time to fix it. So I think it is important to fix this.
I think we should roll back the change for now...
All this shows that the source handling is *far* too complex... How would we realize source handling *today* considering today's resources? (aka: compression is free and memory even on last year's cell phone 20 times larger than our complete system...)
Marcus
-- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com