Yes, that is bad. Can you write a short mail or issue entry about what you did exactly, so that others can try to debug this situation ?
On 13 Apr 2015, at 16:32, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On 13 Apr 2015, at 16:28, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
On 13 Apr 2015, at 16:17, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On 13 Apr 2015, at 15:48, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
We have to generate a new .source file. We will do that for 40606.
This means that there will be two versions of 40606: one that has a V3 Sources and one with a V4 source. To not get confused, the best is to wait for 607.
Ok:
-> sources file is on http://files.pharo.org/sources/
-> the latest image (40606) use it:
http://files.pharo.org/image/40/latest.zip
Next:
- fix get.pharo.org - fix the scripts that build the downloads - do a 607
We did it all.
Result: it is all broken. We will revert it all.
All broken is a bit harsh, but yes this is not fun.
It is all broken: when you look at a class comment it shows you parts of method sources.
Marcus