April 25, 2015
1:25 p.m.
Given that there is consensus, I created: Issue 15399 SmalltalkImage>>#imageName is redundant But, thinking more deeply, maybe the cleaner approach would be to remove it completely. Since #imageFile returns a FS object, one already has easy access to whatever variant of the name one wants: #fullName #basename #base Why pollute the protocol? I don't think it's worth it to save from `imageFile base` to `imageName`... And this would apply to #changesName as well... ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/SmalltalkImage-imageName-tp4821681p4821788.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.