On Aug 29, 2011, at 6:35 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote:
Nautilus looks to me like yet another Smalltalk-80 browser that works exactly the same as all previous Smalltalk browsers in the last 32 years (including OB). IMHO fixed lists, a text field and ugly buttons do not cut it anymore. Did any Smalltalker ever work with XCode, Eclipse, VisualStudio, ...?
Have a "basic" browser so that we can get rid of StringHolder.
You could push down all the code of StringHolder into the subclass(es) and remove the empty class. This can be done with RB with a few clicks.
No more for me.
Introducing more code into Pharo that depends on more parts of Pharo (RPackage, Announcement, Pragma, Ring, RB, Shout, ...) doesn't make it easier to maintain and change Pharo. Or did I misunderstand something about cohesion and coupling? :-)
With that philosophy, we can just declare Pharo as finished and do something else. My point of view is that I invent new abstractions *and than use them* on and for the system itself. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de