Feb. 13, 2013
7:57 a.m.
On Feb 13, 2013, at 8:51 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
* take an old image (somewhere early in 4.4's history) * update it * store that as one artifact, A * run tests on a copy to get the test results * a second job takes A and runs the necessary ReleaseBuilder to get B, a release candidate.
This is what we do, too.
What I mean are things like condensing the sources and changes. Or Monticello meta data⦠something that grows with every commit is not something that is sustainable.
If "the release image" is different to what everyone downloads in the development phase for development and testing, we do something wrong. Marcus