2015-04-21 15:21 GMT+02:00 stepharo <stepharo@free.fr>:
@esteban Pavel is not stupid. So we could ask him what are his scenarios.
@Pavel So pavel can you explain what and why you need?
And yes we will have to have another level of tooling because now it can be really difficult
I simply wanted to make a local Pharo FileTree repository to have a free hands for testing of system configurations. Something like a personal Pharo fork. The fact that this packages are all missing because they are already handled by configurations is welcomed information. However I think that repositories of this project should be in the list of default repositories. Maybe we should add copy of the configurations to the Pharo50 repository too. Cheers, -- Pavel
@esteban we should add the repositories to the projects because we should be able to publish in this repositories. Else it will be again the time of the guy fixing a problem that will be consumed.
Or we can also simply say to people that we do not care of their time, but I would prefer that we pay attention. In that case this is simple for me I will not fix or even look at code that is not in the main system and with this approach we will all have lost something.
Stef