Ok so do we following the seaside way or the other? Once we get decided I will do a pass and be compliant :) Stef
On Jan 30, 2009, at 15:33 , Michael Rueger wrote:
Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
so what are the organizations we can use? Ideally I would like to have the test associated with their packages.
XXX XXXTests
The problem with that naming scheme is that then the tests would always be loaded together with their tests because of the simple string matching Monticello does. Which isn't something you want when doing application/runtime builds.
That's why I proposed the Plugin-* and Tests-* naming schemes.
+1
Adrian _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project