With Keith's version you can do this: #(1 10 11 2 10 11 3 10 11 4) splitOn: #(10 11) I was assuming that the thing we use to split was a regex string. 'hello there' split: '\s' Actually I see that Damien added this possibility in RubyShards as well. This also works: #(1 10 11 2 10 11 3 10 11 4) split: #(10 11) It seems that RubyShards is more general, but we need to take a closer look at both solutions. The interfaces are not the same. There may be differences in performance. - on On Apr 5, 2009, at 17:47, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
I would be in favor to have a nice oo solution :) I do not know what means "uses a sequence to split a sequence."
Stef
OK, I had a closer look.
Keith's implementation is completely different from, and pre-dates, that of Damien and myself.
Keith's version works for SequenceableCollections, and uses a sequence to split a sequence.
Ours is more tailored towards Strings, and uses a regex to split a String.
Perhaps we can consider a merge in which sequences can be split using sequences, and Strings can additionally be split using regexes.
We should also take efficiency into account. I did not run any benchmarks yet to compare the implementations
Who is interested in merging these two?
Cheers, - on
On Apr 5, 2009, at 16:25, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote:
Hi Keith,
Now I see there are attached files in Mantis. But they all seem to date from 2006, whereas your latest comments are from Jan 2009. Are there more recent files from 2009 that I should look at? If so, where are they?
What is the best way to proceed? Shall I create a Join project on SqueakSource, and if it is updated, post the latest version on Mantis too?
Cheers, - on
On Apr 5, 2009, at 16:08, Keith Hodges wrote:
Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
I wrote the split join implementation that is available on mantis
http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=4874
I use it all the time, if you would like to improve on what is there, please continue to contribute to the mantis page discussion/ tests and code. That way we will get an polished implementation that can be added to squeak or to pharo.
The suggestion to use #species would be fine (I never use species myself, because I dont understand what its really for).
or class the point is that you get back a collection of the same kind of the receiver
When stef says "I have checked the code and it looks nice" he didnt say which code he checked, so I am confused.
I looked at the latest version in the repository mentioned by oscar rubyshards
Which appears to me to be the opposite of what Oscar suggested. If I read the email, he asked what the status of mantis 4874 was, anticipating that it be integrated. He had "gone back" to ruby shards in the absense of the integration of 4784.
Keith
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project