On 08 Jul 2015, at 19:13, Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com> wrote:
Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 wrote
I do remember adding this especially for you ;-)
Ha ha, yes I remember... the #/ is certainly useful. My question is just about the name #withPathSegments:. Maybe something like #withAddedPathSegments: might be clearer? Also, there is the #copyXyz convention used elsewhere in Pharo. Maybe#copyAddingPathSegments: for uniformity?
Maybe, but where do you find proof for the #withX: meaning 'replace X in a copy of the receiver ' ? I mean, it does not strike me as confusing. Of course, the longer #copyAddingPathSegments: is long and clear.
----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/ZnUrl-withPathSegments-Surprise-tp4836593p4836596.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.