Re: [Pharo-project] A comparative article (was Re: [squeak-dev] [ANN] STON - Smalltalk Object Notation)

I would like to share my quick two cents regarding this subject. 1st cent. I would stick with JSON. Even though I find STON slick, I would not deviate from something that is mainstream and all Smalltalk dialects already support. 2nd cent. A Dictionary literal syntax would be useful too. I would like to have it. It could be something like #{'this' -> 1. 'that' -> 2 }, and keep {1. 2} for dynamic arrays. Regards, -- Esteban. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/ANN-STON-Smalltalk-Object-Notation-tp4609808p4620499.h... Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.