March 22, 2011
5:51 p.m.
On 22 March 2011 13:28, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On Mar 22, 2011, at 1:25 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
+1
Now condenses change should work too :)
I am slowly adopting a radical "if we don't test it, it's will brake" point of view. I now even say: If we don't test it, it *should* be broken! Because it is dead code and should be removed.
I like a systematic approach. :)
    Marcus
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.