I have created the http://www.squeaksource.com/shout/Shout.3.15-tween.71.mcz package which no longer contains MVC stuff. Unfortunately, I can't add it to Universes - the Universe editor tells me it is owned by someone else :( I agree with your suggestion of not supporting MVC in squeak-dev images anymore. "Damien Cassou" <damien.cassou@gmail.com> wrote in message news:6ac749c10806170637t7343f960h7ccb2791b268bf3e@mail.gmail.com... On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Andrew Tween <amtween@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Damien Cassou" <damien.cassou@gmail.com> wrote in message news:6ac749c10806170613p3edfb55h3fddcaf61fca4f0c@mail.gmail.com... On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Andrew Tween <amtween@hotmail.com> wrote:
I'll take a look and see if I can create a Pharo compatible Shout,
Do you think it can be possible to have Shout compatible with both Pharo and Squeak at the same time? Otherwise, we will have to maintain a separate universe which will complicate my work a lot.
I plan to remove MVC from Shout. And create a separate, optional, ShoutMVC package that can be loaded after loading the main Shout package.
This is the best solution I think.
Will you be able to load ShoutMVC into Squeak images, but not load it into Pharo?
It is possible yes but no straightforward. The simplest solution is not to support MVC anymore in squeak-dev images. What do you think?
If not, then I can create a .sar installer which checks for the existance of MVC before loading ShoutMVC
It is the simplest solution for me, but not for you :-). Do you think ShoutMVC could be of interest to anyone? -- Damien Cassou Peter von der Ahé: «I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good luck». (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu)