On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 11:09:51AM +0200, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
On 5 Aug 2017, at 11:06, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 10:49:02AM +0200, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
I think there is a consensus we need to keep #cr and #lf as intended, yet to add some kind of #newLine (which btw is different to EOL :P) vocabulary, isn???t?
In this, I favour Peter approach for define line ending convention (the way #newLine will work)??? and of course by default it should use the one from the current platform.
anything agains this approach?
Esteban
+1
I prefer #nl to #newLine, but admit that it is a subjective preference and that descriptive names are generally better.
heh, me too... but is a bit cryptic.
#nl "Insert the platform dependent end of line character. For people that haven't got used to terminal communications rising above 9600baud" ^self newLine :-)