On 11 February 2010 20:53, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
hi all
Jannik and jb started to replace all the     and:and:     and:and:and:     and:and:and:and:     and the same for or:
by they equivalent ie
1 =2 or: [ 1=3 ] or: [1=1] => 1 =2 or: [ 1=3 Â or: [1=1]]
the new compiler optimize both while the old one not. So now I would like to see what do you think.
Personnally I do not like and:and:and: and more Now for and:and: I'm hesitating.
I am against using #and:and: and #or:or:. It is slow, confusing and incompatible with any other Smalltalk out there. Kill all users ;-) Lukas
Stef
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch