March 3, 2010
10:14 p.m.
On 03.03.2010 22:21, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
The paper talks about using stack pointer and program counter as identifiers, I doubt stack depth as returned by such a method will provide a good enough granularity to do proper disambiguation. (not to mention the main reason for using them is that they can be gotten with virtually no overhead...) Not only the stack depth. But the function identity is given by the compiled method reference. Associating the stack depth with the compiled method will do the job apparently.
Cheers, Alexandre
Read a little past the abstract, and you'll understand what I was trying to tell you. Cheers, Henry