Dec. 1, 2016
7:18 a.m.
On 1 Dec 2016, at 08:06, Stephan Eggermont <stephan@stack.nl> wrote:
On 01/12/16 07:25, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
OK then. Why was this change no merged then ? Maybe it is a lot slower ? Is this VM available somewhere ?
It was reverted, as that vm had more stability problems.
That is very general ;-)
From a distance (not knowing anything about it), it seems that HDi support was considered not important. Else more people would work on it to fix its teething problems, no ?
Stephan