On 19 Aug 2016, at 17:35, Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com> wrote:
stepharo wrote
Let me know. I do not care about examplar or sample.
In the original thread [1]: - The most popular naming option was for some combination of exampleInstance, exampleCode, sampleInstance, and sampleCode because they are both natural-sounding-to-native-ears and explicit. - There was a small (Ben and I) consensus leaning specifically toward <exampleCode> together with <sampleInstance>
That makes a lot of sense, so +1 And UI stuff would then be a case of <exampleCode> right, as side effect ?
- Exemplar (note it's not spelled exAmplar) is a bit obscure English - There were some more exotic parameterized varieties discussed, but maybe it's best to save those for a future evolution
[1] http://forum.world.st/lt-example-gt-pragmas-and-example-methods-use-cases-td...
----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/example-examplar-tp4911728p4911947.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.