OK, thanks, I will have a look. On 20 Jun 2014, at 10:56, François Stephany <tulipe.moutarde@gmail.com> wrote:
Max,
Yes, it's usable as the SHA1 package already there (without HMAC so). I'm no expert in those stuff but I don't get "SHA256 base implementation". Someone with more knowledge can probably tell ;)
Sven,
The bare minimum to load it is:
Gofer it smalltalkhubUser: 'JanVanDeSandt' project: 'Cloudfork'; package: 'Cloudfork-Common'; package: 'Cloudfork-Pharo-Platform'; load.
The implementation is in Cloudfork-Pharo-Platform.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote: I want to have a look, if you tell me where to look...
On 19 Jun 2014, at 18:03, Max Leske <maxleske@gmail.com> wrote:
On 19.06.2014, at 17:59, François Stephany <tulipe.moutarde@gmail.com> wrote:
Does it make sense from a license point of view and practical point of view to include the CloudFork HMAC-SHA256 implementation (CFSH256 class) in the System-Hashing package (in where there's already SHA1 and MD5) ?
Can Cloudfork HMAC-SHA256 be easily parameterized with, say, an SHA256 base implementation? Or does it require extra stuff? In the former case I probably wouldnât add it. In the latter case itâs open for discussion. Personally, I think it belongs into a separate package, not into System-Hashing.
Cheers, Max