Bryce, Thanks for your reply. Actually, I mentioned FFI etc. because that appeared to be a way to get what OSProcess wanted in terms of dependencies; using Universes should handle that part for me. FFI would be of interest on its own, but appears to make people nervous. Is that for good reason? Put another way, if I want to make some calls into a dll/so, do I really need to mess around with creating/compiling/distributing a plugin? It seems like a lot of overhead, especially since Dolphin does such a nice job based on a mechanism very similar (in apperance at least) to FFI. That said, I am interested in candid opinions; maybe things really are different in Squeak/Pharo. Thanks! Bill Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. University of Florida Department of Anesthesiology PO Box 100254 Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 Email: bschwab@anest.ufl.edu Tel: (352) 273-6785 FAX: (352) 392-7029
bryce@kampjes.demon.co.uk 9/30/2008 2:12 PM >>> Bill Schwab writes: Before doing something I might regret, I wanted to check with you about installing OSProcess, VMMaker(?), FFI, etc. Do you have anything to say "try it and report any problems?"
I load OSProcess and FFI from universes, it works loading into a recent pharo-dev image. There's an issue with CommandShell as it subclasses off some MVC classes, I think it's safe to ignore. I'd load VMMaker from SqueakSource directly, but it depends on what you want to do. I've merged the FreeType changes into the Exupery VM's and will add closure support in the next few days. Loading Exupery-dev from the universes will load all the packages you listed. (Though, there's an incompatibility between Exupery and the stricter instance variable checks in Pharo, will be fixed in the next release.) Bryce _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project