I like the one-click too, but Torsten is correct that many Windows users will want an installer. If nothing else, having one proves that it can be done - *we* know that it can, but the FUD crowd will raise it as a concern. Let's prove them wrong. InnoSetup is worth a look. ________________________________________ From: pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr [pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Geert Claes [geert.wl.claes@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 4:32 AM To: pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] PharoOneClick .lnk file Torsten Bergmann wrote:
I expect a windows user to be more satisfied with a typicall installer that also set up program group, ... and allows also to uninstall. And this installer download is also smaller than the OneClick since Linux/Mac VMs are not necessary.
I don't think we need to have a full blown installer which creates a shortcut to the program group with an uninstaller. I would prefer your suggestion to simply put the Pharo.exe on the top level. I like the fact OneClick has Windows, Mac and Linux i none download and I don't think the size is a problem at all. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/PharoOneClick-lnk-file-tp3342350p3343156.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.