April 29, 2015
6:36 p.m.
2015-04-29 12:49 GMT-03:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu>:
On 29 Apr 2015, at 17:39, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaringolo@gmail.com> wrote: In the case of GLORP, which I'm updating too, TimeStamp use is more extended, because it's also a datatype used to map table columns, but using no timezone offset. I guess if we move to DateAndTime we should preserve that behavior in order to not break anything.
I don't understand this last point, could you elaborate ?
As far as I see it, there is nothing TimeStamp did that DateAndTime cannot do.
Me neither. But I simply don't wan't to break anything. :)
ps: I'm so tempted to fork from the GLORP package, rename as something else (PLORM?) and refactor it mercilessly. That is something else ;-)
:)