Is it normal that a clean 60178 image is still missing the class after loading GitFileTree from the catalog? On 4 June 2016 at 09:37, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
This is why we need to have metadata of loaded packages inside the image.
Because right now the maintainer of the package is forced to remove information from his configuration :(
Been there with RB.
Setf
Le 3/6/16 à 13:38, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit :
yes, but then GitFileTree from catalog is downloading a wrong version :)
On 03 Jun 2016, at 13:28, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
STON is now (in 6.0) used as JSON parser.
On 03 Jun 2016, at 13:24, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
this class is not there anymore :
MCFileTreeJsonParser
(Pharo 6.0 version)
-- Damien Pollet type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet