esteban I think that you can really use pharo for development and give us feedback. for deployment you may switch in alpha phase if needed. The path will be long but the journey is really worth :) Stef On Sep 16, 2008, at 8:06 PM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
Hi, Thanks for the answers. The main reason I want to run the application on Pharo is because I'm agree with it's objetives, and I been following the project advance through the list and I'm very happy with the ongoing work. Unfortunately, I'm to busy to offer some help... but maybe I can help on "testing" by using Pharo on a commercial project... So, following Adrian suggestion, as my project will take 4-5 months of development, I think the best path should be to wait a little and start using Pharo in a couple of months. And of course, I want to produce professional applications, so what better to use a professional version of squeak? :)
Cheers, Esteban
On 2008-09-16 13:49:48 -0300, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> said:
Hi Esteban As Stef said, you should not run into major problems because the core on which a Seaside application usually depends has not changed much. The parts of Pharo that have undergone major changes (or that have been totally removed) will likely not affect you. I think that you should also take into account when you plan to go live. If this is in just another week or two, I would not go for Pharo. However, if this is a larger project that takes longer, then I suggest to use Pharo. I think we will be fast to fix bugs if you report them (whereas at the Squeak side the activity seems to be a bit less than over here ;)). And over time more and more people will start to use Pharo in professional projects too. Please let us know how you decide and in case you run into any troubles that need our attention. Cheers, Adrian On Sep 16, 2008, at 18:02 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi Esteban Lukas is developing seaside on pharo. Netstyle will certainly use it once the first release is out. Now the point is do you need the improvements we are doing? May be 3.9 is good enough or pavel image. From a stability point of view the changes are currently low from api changes - we are cleaning a lot but not changing. And this may change a bit in the future but this is ineluctable. If people want something better they have to ack changes. We will also try to keep changes to the minimum but not less. We want a better system and as such it will change. Stef On Sep 16, 2008, at 5:39 PM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
Hi, I'm planning to start a new commercial, seaside based project in a few weeks, and I wish to start it in Pharo, but I'm afraid is not very stable yet... Can somebody tell me if is usable right now and if not, more or less when it will be? Thanks, Esteban _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project