Hi, At the moment I am moving Pharo quality tools to Renraku model. This is a quality model that Iâve been working on and that was used so far by QualityAssistant. At the moment Iâm stuck while trying to do changes in Monkey, as it is really hard to understand how quality checks are made there. @Guille maybe you can advise something. In the old model Rules were both checking code and storing the entities that violate them. In Renraku Rules are responsible only for checking, then for each violation they produce a critique object that is a mapping between the rule and the entity that violates the rule. Also critiques can provide plenty of additional information such as suggestion on how to fix the issue. At the moment we can skip the critiques altogether, just run the rules and store the classes and method that violate them. But at the moment I cannot how Monkey in implemented. I.e. where do the rules come from and what output should be provided. Cheers. Uko