Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo+Git cons?

"Well, it’s not complete, far fromit actually. Git is huge… (also, see my response to Thierry)" yes that sound more logical . "Yes, but the tools should use libgit2 bindings, not the Smalltalk implementation." that sounds even more logical too. I am asking those questions because at the moment I thought I was missing something. I read people discussing implementing git in Pharo like its a one man project while my understanding is that git is huge and probably even bigger than pharo itself and that the problems is trying to solve are far more complex than the existing version control system of Pharo. But I am far from expert on this. using libgit2 sounds to me like a logical evolution for Pharo.