Adrian, Whatever you guys think about underscores timing is fine by me. From my own perspective, there is no "too soon" but there might be for others. My code is unlikely to load in the core. Since the slice fixing SharedQueue2 was marked depdendent on sequenceable collection fixes that I can't load, I'm hesitant to get overly creative. I suppose I could try loading the web image install script into a core image to see if it runs in a reasonable time. Bill -----Original Message----- From: pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr [mailto:pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Adrian Lienhard Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 3:12 PM To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] prebuilt 1.1 #11035 On Nov 7, 2009, at 20:59 , Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
A 1.1 alpha under construction is great. When do underscores appear, especially in class names? I thought I saw that creeping forward, and want to register my encouragement of any effort to have that appear in 1.1. Ok, I'll stop nagging :)
It shouldn't be hard to do in 1.1. I discussed with Lukas today and one open question is whether we want to enforce _ not being a valid assignment already in 1.0. I fear a bit that people will complain because they have to fix their code before being able to load it into Pharo. Does anybody see a problem with this? From the previous discussion I understand that most people would favor the change. But is 1.0 too early?
For 1.0, I'm still stuck by the SharedQueue2 problem. I cannot load the sequencable collection fixes into either RC image - I thought I might be able to load it into RC1-dev and then file out the needed pieces into RC1-web, but no-go :(
Can you also try to load your code into a core image? The update I did yesterday includes the SharedQueue2 fixes. Please let us know if it does not fix the problem. Adrian
Bill
-----Original Message----- From: pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr [mailto:pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr ] On Behalf Of Adrian Lienhard Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 2:38 PM To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] prebuilt 1.1 #11035
Yes, we have a 1.0 and a 1.1 stream now (actually since the sprint in Lille).
I'm integrating remaining critical fixes for 1.0, while Stef and the other integrators have started working on 1.1. I don't think it's too early at all. It allows us to keep the pace to move forward with new stuff, while stabilizing and afterwards maintaining the 1.0 release.
Just as a reminder, here are the main goals we have set for 1.1:
- New preferences system - Integrate Alien - Improve code quality (e.g., make selected Lint tests pass) - Continuous integration system
(http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Milestones)
Cheers, Adrian
On Nov 7, 2009, at 20:15 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
mmmmmmm are we already in 1.1 alpha ??? isn't it to early ?
Best
Mariano
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Marcus Denker <denker@acm.org> wrote:
http://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/24734/PharoCore-1.1-11035- alp ha.zip
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project