Hi, I think this is a great idea. Thanks for opening the issues. Now, the only question is where to put these. You suggest the package Manifest. I think this would work for individual packages, but as we are moving to projects (with Metacello), I would suggest to put these methods in the Configurations. This would also fit from a conceptual encapsulation point of view: loading and unloading are in the same place. What do you think? Doru
On Aug 27, 2016, at 11:00 AM, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
You see hernan doing positively is the best way to make that things happen
We can have a
preUnload hook
Now we should check how it fits with cleanForProduction and others.
But we should definitively have a way to express this.
So let us see how we can design it and then just implement it. I'm sure that GT people are open to such hooks
and if you really want to get a better Pharo for you then talk to them and us.
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/18997/Add-unload-to-package-manifest-in-QA
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/18998/Add-unload-to-package-manifest-of-Sp...
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/18999/Add-unload-to-package-manifest-in-GT...
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/19000/Add-unload-to-package-manifest-in-GT
Stef
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know her."