Yes. Reading what Juan Vuletich is working on for the next Morphic there is a lot said about things I imagine would negatively impact performance if a lot of deliberate effort isn't made to offset them. On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaringolo@gmail.com> wrote:
I couldn't tell exactly, I haven't used Cuis in the last year or so, but at that time (Pharo 2 was new) it was the faster of the three brothers (Pharo/Squeak/Cuis).
Maybe that changed lately and Cuis got slower too. Apparently it is very easy to bloat Morphic.
Regards,
Esteban A. Maringolo
2014-06-01 21:07 GMT-03:00 darrinm <darrin@massena.com>:
You get a Cuis image and it's super fast.
What machine are you running on? I just gave the 2009 image of Cuis a try on my current-model Mac Pro (3.6 GHz, 6 cores, tons of RAM) and honestly just dragging a window around was terribly slow. Just guessing, I'd say 10 FPS or less which probably half what I see with Pharo.
Is the VM a factor? Should I try a different one?
Thanks.
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/GPU-accelerated-GUI-tp4760898p4761231.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.