Ok then I will produce packages in the inbox. I could publish directly but I would like that somebody else has a look at what I'm doing. Stef On Sep 21, 2008, at 7:48 PM, Marcus Denker wrote:
On 21.09.2008, at 18:26, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Marcus and others
Do you think that the cs approach is good because after applying them we will have to publish new packages? So could you harvest these ones for example and let me know what do you think and if cs is better? because I could produce also packages.
Packages are good, too. Just a removal package that re-classifies the methods is not good.
Marcus
Stef
On Sep 20, 2008, at 10:29 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Another one :) Cleaning the inspector.
<EtoyRemoval-002-CleanInspector.2.cs>
Stef_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- Marcus Denker -- denker@iam.unibe.ch http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~denker
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project