Status: New Owner: ---- New issue 3660 by jfitz...@gmail.com: Revert incorrect Monticello branch naming support http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3660 After recent discussion with Dale Henrichs (see http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/seaside-dev/2011-February/004557... ) I realize that my fix in Issue 281 was not correct. Actually, I'm not even sure whether the bug report was valid to begin with. The correct MC branch naming convention should be: <hyphenated-package-name>.<dotted.branch.tag>-<initials>.<count>.mcz and it appears the tools are currently largely supporting this. The *incorrect* convention pushed in by Issue 281 was: <hyphenated-package-name>-<initials>.<dotted.branch.tag>.<count>.mcz I don't know if the incorrect convention has become widely adopted, but it would reduce future confusion if we can back out the Issue 281 "fix".