It would be cool if it didn't take 3+ hours to load. 2.8 is much more reasonable. Is 3 that much bigger, or is something wrong with the configuration? -----Original Message----- From: pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr [mailto:pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Stan Shepherd Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 4:38 AM To: pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [BetaTesting] [ANN] Pharo1.0-10505-rc1dev10.01.1 Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Stan Shepherd <stan.shepherd414@gmail.com>wrote:
The only concern is that it took some hours
hours ? seriously ?
to download and install Seaside (albeit on a slow spare PC). And with occassional network glitches, I had to restart a method a few times from a debugger.
Yes, it was 3 hr 29m on the old machine, but I don't know what percent it was halted due to network glitches. It would be really cool if it made say 3 retries when its HTTP gets failed. I ran overnight on main machine (Ubuntu 9.04, 3 GHz dual core 1GB ram, nominal 7Gb internet but other downloads running) with message tally - 71 minutes. ...Stan -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/BetaTesting-ANN-Pharo1-0-10505-rc1dev10-01-1-tp4278312p... Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project