Goubier Thierry wrote
Le 06/09/2013 14:13, Marcus Denker a écrit :
So you want more change in 2.0? You can have that, but you need to accept instability. There is no way to have both more changes and more stability.
I'm OK for that. 3.0 is just plainly too unstable, and this is the way it should be. But 2.0 shouldn't be considered a dead platform ;)
I feel the same pain and was motivated enough to create my special interim version mentioned above. And, having previously backported autocompletion (for 1.4 iirc), I can verify that backporting requires significant manpower. I introduced bugs which I then felt compelled to spend many hours fixing (instead of working) because I had broken production software. Given our massive vision, I feel that manpower is better spent moving forward. And I am willing to deal with the pain of feeling one step behind development if it gets us to the system of our dreams. ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/OSProcess-for-Pharo3-0-tp4706087p4707036.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.