On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 5:13 PM, stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse@free.fr> wrote:
On Mar 12, 2013, at 4:48 PM, Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
Dear Pharoers
last january I visited another lab and I realised that the Pharo Team was not good at systematically telling what we were doing. I got quite frustrated by that situation, especially because we are working hard to build a better system. So we brainstormed when I came back and we want to apply the same ideas that what we do for our research team.
For our research team every monday we get a simple mail that tell us to say to the others what we did and what we plan to do. Simple, easy. Then after people of the rmod team can discuss if they want more.
It looks like quite an interesting idea in a research team. Do you a have a description somewhere how it works ? This is similar to a standup meeting ?
we tried but a stand up meeting failed with us. So we just have a mail what you have done what you will do
I would like to adopt such habits in my team, but standup meeting for research team is not really convenient. There is a paper where SCRUM is adapted to research team needs: http://www.cs.umd.edu/~mwh/papers/score.pdf There is a business doing something like standup meeting by email here: https://www.funscrum.com/ Apparently all the answers are summarized automatically. Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/