June 19, 2014
4:20 p.m.
I want to have a look, if you tell me where to look... On 19 Jun 2014, at 18:03, Max Leske <maxleske@gmail.com> wrote:
On 19.06.2014, at 17:59, François Stephany <tulipe.moutarde@gmail.com> wrote:
Does it make sense from a license point of view and practical point of view to include the CloudFork HMAC-SHA256 implementation (CFSH256 class) in the System-Hashing package (in where there's already SHA1 and MD5) ?
Can Cloudfork HMAC-SHA256 be easily parameterized with, say, an SHA256 base implementation? Or does it require extra stuff? In the former case I probably wouldnât add it. In the latter case itâs open for discussion. Personally, I think it belongs into a separate package, not into System-Hashing.
Cheers, Max