The idea is that alain would like to have only one theme but fully parametrized and that we can unify all that. Typically orange should not be a subclass :). Now you are probably right and I want to remove some other not working theme: Pro and a couple of others. On Mar 2, 2011, at 7:43 PM, DougEdmunds wrote:
Shouldn't the Glamour-Morphic-Theme package be renamed to fall under Polymorph-Widgets, like the other themes?
It seem that otherwise, the package system will get cluttered with individual theme names. I think of the packaging system as most generic to more specific (using the hyphens).
Glamour-Morphic-Theme seems to stick out as not following this naming convention.
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Glamour-Morphic-Theme-package-rename-tp3332037p3332037... Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.