Sept. 3, 2015
7:31 p.m.
why not both ? On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 9:45 PM stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
*) It appears that Pharo is removing subString: in favor of substring:. The ANSI standard defines subString:.
I was not aware of it. In fact ANSI is bad and totally incomplete (for example we studies strings and this is a mess and totally incomplete). Now we should probably add it. I will send the mail to the mailing-list and let people decide.