Lukas, I get three fails of your 'meta' tests: #testIdentifier - 'Got ''$a'', but expected ''a''' #testCamelCase - '#normalizeCamelCase: is not idempotent' (puts in an extra space) 'Camel Case' vs 'Camel Case' #testSelector - '#normalizeSelector: is not idempotent' also in the original tests on real classes RBArgumentVariableNamesSpellingClass>>argumentVariableNamesSpelling: rong <- not flagged ^self RBTemporaryVariableNamesSpellingClassSideClass>>temporaryVariableNamesSpellingClassSide | rongTemporary | <- not flagged ^self RBCorrectSpellingClass 'IT' 'OK and 'don't' are all flagged - don't is not flagged. Is this your preferred behaviour? What do you think about including the 'real' tests as well as the meta tests? Real tests also have the benefit of serving as examples to people who are trying to use tests to understand the system. And there might be a risk that a meta test passes without testing the real live situation. ...Stan -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/BetaTesting-ANN-Pharo1-0-10507-rc2dev10-01-2-tp4440307p... Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.