Hernan I would really love that you think twice before pressing the button sent mail. Else I will finish to put you on my kill list and I will be sad but so far I see from you often frustration. Could you try to be positive? You will see as a state of mind this is so much more pleasant. There are many aspects of Nautilus that I do not like but there are even more aspect about the old browser and OB that I hate! And as you know doing is difficult. So what is the point. How many anonymous classes did I created over the last five year: none. What do we do with class side? packages? Why do you expect that a tools supporting the Smalltalk metaclass model should suport Anonymous classes? BTW I'm the guy in Squeak that fixed long long long time ago Behavior new new (So I know a bit on anonymous classes). When I used anonymous classes I did it to support instance based programming. So should I expect my hack to work with normal browser? Now may be the anonymous classes you create should return a dummy package. Stef Le 26/1/15 07:44, Hernán Morales Durand a écrit :
I want to discuss case 14789 (https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14789/Nautilus-assumes-a-class-always-unde...) because a class should be browseable even without a definition. Anonymous classes are still classes.
If Nautilus project cannot deal with the whole Smalltalk power then it is poorly designed and I wonder what's the advantage over the old OmniBrowser...
Hernán