i know but not every PasteUpMorph has to be the World... from PasteUpMorph comments "A morph whose submorphs comprise a paste-up of rectangular subparts which "show through". Anything called a 'Playfield' is a PasteUpMorph." i'm just saying that anything related to the world concept semantically doesnt belong to what i understand for PasteUpMorph. Francisco On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
the World is an instance of PasteUpMorph
On Jan 18, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Francisco Ortiz Peñaloza wrote:
imho i don't think that PasteUpMorph should undestand #worldMenu... but i dont see clearly the best place to put it.
I'm aware that there are more messages like this one in PasteUpMorph like #adaptedWorld or #getWorldMenu: but i think that PasteUpMorph and World belong to a different levels of abstraction.
Francisco
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 5:15 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
in 1.0
PasteUpMorph>>worldMenu     ^ TheWorldMenu new adaptToWorld: self
was defined as service extension
in 1.1 services have been removed
Now HostSystemMenusMacOSX uses the following pattern
... Â self buildSubMenusFor: World worldMenu openMenu. ...
We could either reintroduce
    PasteUpMorph>>worldMenu or     in HostSystemMenusMac
Does anybody have some criteria to differentiate the two places?
Stef
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project