Ok I'm trying I have version102: spec <version: '1.0.2' imports: #('1.0-baseline') > spec for: #common do: [ spec blessing: #release. spec package: 'FileSystem']. (ConfigurationOfFilesystem project version: '1.0.2') load worked now (MetacelloToolBox validateConfiguration: ConfigurationOfFilesystem) inspect Critical Warning: No version specified for the package 'Filesystem' in version '1.0.1' { noVersionSpecified } [ #validateVersionSpec: ] Critical Warning: The name of package 'FileSystem' does not match the file name 'Filesystem-cwp.63' in version '1.0.1' { packageNameMismatch } [ #validateVersionSpec: ] Critical Warning: No version specified for the package 'Filesystem' in version '1.0.2' { noVersionSpecified } [ #validateVersionSpec: ] I was confused why this is a critical warning? MetacelloToolBox descriptionForValidationReasonCode: #noVersionSpecified I got a DNU at:at: Stef On Feb 3, 2011, at 10:18 PM, Dale Henrichs wrote:
On Feb 3, 2011, at 1:08 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
I tried to publish a new configurationOfFilesystem but after 15 min I stopped because I could not make it load. For me there is something wrong with the interface of metacello because I can never remember it version: '1.0.2' did not load it while it defined as version: #'1.0.2' and of course I tried string and symobols....
Stef,
I recommend that you try to use the validator:
(MetacelloToolBox validateConfiguration: ConfigurationOfFilesystem) inspect
The validator should complain about using #'1.0.2' or '1.0.2' incorrectly. If the issue printString isn't enough you should be able to get more info from the #reasonCode:
MetacelloToolBox descriptionForValidationReasonCode: <reasonCode from validation issue>
If the validator doesn't provide a good enough explanation, I'm interested in improving it.
If you run into a problem when you reconstruct the configuration and the validator doesn't give you good information, then please feel free to ship me a copy of the configuration so I can be the human validator - which in turn will spur me on to improve the validator:)
I extend this invitation to anyone having trouble with Metacello.
Dale