The mail was more that I would prefer to have less block inside block and cull: On Aug 28, 2013, at 1:14 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
That is what I knew, too. I asked because the mail seemed to suggest that it would work :).
Doru
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote: no, it is not. that will keep the registry forever because it acts over a block (no ephemerons, remember)
Esteban
On Aug 28, 2013, at 11:56 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Does this work?
Doru
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote: whenListChanged: aBlock "Specify a block to value after the contents of the list has changed"
"Basically when you set a new list of items"
<api: #event> | block | block := [ :announcement :ann | aBlock cull: announcement newContents cull: announcement oldContents cull: announcement cull: ann ]. listAnnouncer weak when: ValueChanged do: block
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"