Em 16/05/2011 14:13, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> escreveu:
mariano There was a crash and we spend some couple of hours with marcus to see what we can do. Now apparently the applications does not find some of the files that are on the filesystem. So the code is not lost but squeaksource does not see them. This has nothing with Pharo and Smalltalk. Just that Squeaksource was created in 2002 and that it suffers from the success of Squeak and Pharo. Now this is why ESUG payed objectFusion to propose a new application.
Now again if you give me one engineer full time I'm sure that we can do that. Do you think that svn or git where created from the air without sponsoring......? Just curious. Stef,
Incurring on the risk of sounding like a cat in the Birds of a Feather, I think the attempt to compare svn or git efforts to SqS (or the whole Monticello infra, for the matter) is not correct, because in former the solutions span a wider "audience" with more than a technology/platform/language, whereas the latter is Squeak/Pharo specific. In Smalltalk we have for each flavor a different version control system! To avoid misunderstandings and/or a stretching of this thread without necessity, let assure you folks I _do_ know the aformentioned systems are "file based" and Smalltalk is different, etc., but my observation is /orthogonal/ to this. my 0.0199999... -- Cesar Rabak