My question was also sent to torsten or other. What is the point? and I gave one possible interpretation of future. Stef On Jan 27, 2010, at 1:25 AM, John M McIntosh wrote:
Stef at this point I'm going to poke it with a stick and see if it lives.
Then we can dream, or at least I'll see about your dreaming.
On 2010-01-26, at 12:28 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Two questions:
but what will be the point to have Ginsu? We have the smalltalk metamodel + MC + PseudoClass and do we want one more? I know well Ginsu I have it on my harddisc and read it when MC was not even created and I wrote FAMIX which is a Ginsu for JavaC++Smalltalk.
For me I dream about the following:
- having ONE code metamodel (ginsu or MC) that can be used to do version management = MC versioning but has the same static interface than the Smalltalk runtime so that he can be browsed using the SAME code browser.
-- =========================================================================== John M. McIntosh <johnmci@smalltalkconsulting.com> Twitter: squeaker68882 Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com ===========================================================================