Ok, well it seems to me having KOM and pharo working is *very* important, actually I'm relying on that for a meeting I'm having on friday. Obviously I'll use a version of Pharo from last month... Going forward you can burn all those bridges, but I'm not sure people supporting that other non-pharo stuff would care. Could you have a shim layer that is loaded to respect KOM's expectations for behaviour? Well or otherwise built a completely new MIME system for Pharo and let KOM continue with the obsolete one? On 25-Feb-09, at 10:13 AM, Michael Rueger wrote:
Michael Rueger wrote:
Lukas Renggli wrote:
what seasiders think? I would be in favor to get a KOM pharo version Having two incompatible versions of Kom makes distribution even more painful as it is today. I would prefer to have compatible versions if this is possible.
I will see that I can get Pharo, Kom and Squeak compatible enough for now, no point in riding this out on principle.
Nevertheless the issue still stands, that at some point we have to make that decision.
Michael
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- = = = ======================================================================== John M. McIntosh <johnmci@smalltalkconsulting.com> Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com = = = ========================================================================