On May 9, 2009, at 7:42 PM, Damien Pollet wrote:
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 18:59, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
Come on this is only possible if the changes you do don't break on other code. else people will start to complain that we are polluting the repository with pharo specific version.
Maybe, but I don't think so, provided it's clear the snapshots come from pharo. Sure, it would be easier if MC and Squeaksource supported branches, butâ¦
OK I understand.
I'm just asking for some communication on what you fork, not for backporting everything to Squeak. I think at least the minimum would be to edit the project descriptions to indicate that they have a pharo branch and where to look for it.
Yes please do it since you are an admin
Another solution, for a small package like regex, would be to just mark the latest not-pharo version, and take ownership of the project.
I would prefer to make sure that people understand that they can use it and get a working version for their environment. So if you can publish a more recent version there and make sure that this is clear that this is working on pharo. This would be good.
After all, the only non-pharo guy there is Avi.
-- Damien Pollet type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project