On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:38 AM, GOUBIER Thierry <thierry.goubier@cea.fr> wrote:
________________________________________
De : Pharo-dev [pharo-dev-bounces@lists.pharo.org] de la part de Marcus Denker [marcus.denker@inria.fr] Envoyé : mardi 27 mai 2014 09:58 à : Pharo Development List Objet : Re: [Pharo-dev] is ClassOrganization>>#categories right?
On 27 May 2014, at 01:57, Ben Coman <btc@openInWorld.com> wrote:
GOUBIER Thierry wrote:
In my own code, I allways use ClassOrganization>>#realCategories to avoid getting the --all-- category. I consider the --all-- category to be a GUI artifact, not a class organization concept.
I'd prefer a #protocols (without the --all-- category, of course :)) so ok for deprecating #categories.
+1 for #protocols
returning protocol objects, not symbolsâ¦
Up to you, just that it is consistent... protocol objects everywhere, or symbols everywhere. #categories for symbols, #protocols for protocol objects (and #addCategory: for symbols, #addProtocol: for protocols, and so on...).
A subject for the Pharo Sprint planned by Serge in Paris in two weeks time ?
Why not, we have time in the afternoons. More details about the planned MOOSEDAY in Paris: http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/MOOSEDayUPMC/ Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/