Le 09/04/2015 16:10, stepharo a écrit :
Le 7/4/15 15:19, Thierry Goubier a écrit :
Le 07/04/2015 15:14, Tudor Girba a écrit :
This setting should be removed. Does anyone have anything against that?
Or, could settings be rewritten so that we don't regularly triggers DNUs and MNUs when we reload them?
You know, just regular, declarative, boring settings instead of something which execute code on non-existent Classes half of the time...
We started to extract tge configuration code out of pillar but we do not know if it will work for settings. So far no time to check.
It is called cocoon on pharoextras
Small remark on the documentation on Smalltalkhub: it is STON-based, not JSON-based. Will you make this an item (replace settings by Cocoon) on the roadmap for Pharo5? I know I would. Thierry